![]() ![]() Now check the Files changed tab of your pull request to see the diff between your original notebook and the changes you made. You can use it to manage your branching and pull-request flow from within JupyterLab. If you haven’t discovered it, the JupyterLab Git extension provides a built-in interface for interacting with GitHub. Next, create a new branch, make a change to your notebook, push it to GitHub, and create a pull request. We want to explore the new diff functionality, so once you have pushed your notebook, merge it to your main branch. You can follow the instructions here if you are new to GitHub. If you don’t already have your notebook on GitHub, create a repository for yourself and push your notebook to it. This addresses a real challenge faced by Jupyter Notebook users, making notebooks much easier to collaborate on. The new rich diff feature changes this, with context-aware diffs that display differences in code in notebook cells and differences in cell output. ![]() The GitHub diffs were just raw diffs of the underlying notebook JSON-nearly impossible to meaningfully compare or comment on. ![]() Command-line notebook diffs are awful to work with and prior to this new feature, GitHub diffs for notebooks were equally bad: One reason is that the under-the-hood JSON format of Jupyter Notebooks makes it non-trivial to compare them, so the standard version-control process of checking diffs doesn’t work well. Version control and code review of Jupyter Notebooks is notoriously tricky. The feature is not yet generally available, so if you want to try it out you can sign up here for early access. GitHub notebook rich diffs: The definitive guideĭata scientists and analysts worldwide breathed a sigh of relief at the recent news that GitHub is introducing rich diffs for Jupyter Notebooks. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |